Thinking Critically About Peer Review

The  peer review we do in class is effective in the sense that we get input in our writing from more than one person before getting a chance to look it over ourselves.  One way I think peer review can be improved is by having three separate one on one  sessions with a peer reviewer instead of having one session with three or four, it would just help keep ideas organized.  My strengths in peer review is my ability to communicate ideas, as well as my ability to help people expand on their own ideas.  I would say that my weakness in peer review is my ability to catch grammatical errors.  I would enjoy peer review if we get the chance to our writing review by someone else, before we turn in our final.  I find that for me peer review is more effective when I am working in smaller groups. I do feel like the time we spend on peer review is fine; however, I feel like the process would be more effective if  we had feed back on different occasions at different times.